4.7 Article

Experimental and simulated study on a novel compressed air drying system using a liquid desiccant cycle

期刊

ENERGY
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 60-71

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.183

关键词

Compressed air; Drying; Liquid desiccant; Waste heat recovery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776036]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan Project of China [2018YFC0705300]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method using liquid desiccant in compressed air drying was put forward in our previous work. However, only the test bench of the pressurized dehumidifier was established and analyzed. And the regenerator was not established, so the proposed system was not complete. Thus, the system performance of the complete system is unknown. In this paper, the experimental bench and steady-state mathematical model of the complete system are established to investigate the system performance. The dew point of compressed air is -2.4 degrees C (0.8 MPa) in experiments, indicating dryness could meet needs of various industries which use cooling dehumidification. Besides, the average regeneration temperature is 72.9 degrees C in experiments, indicating using waste heat from the air compressor to drive solution regeneration is feasible. Moreover, effect of different key parameters, including solution flow rate, solution temperature and ambient conditions on system performance is analyzed by mathematical model. It can be concluded that relative higher solution flow rate, lower inlet solution temperature of dehumidifier and higher inlet solution temperature of regenerator can get a lower humidity ratio. The selected regeneration temperatures in different ambient conditions are 70 degrees C (summer), 39 degrees C (winter), 60 degrees C (transitional season) respectively, which can be used as a reference for the actual operation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据