4.7 Review

A review of the role of distributed generation (DG) in future electricity systems

期刊

ENERGY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 822-836

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.022

关键词

Distributed generation; Distributed energy; Soft-linking; Centralised electricity system; Decentralised Electricity system; Energy and electricity system modelling tools

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [16/US-C2C/3290]
  2. National Science Foundation [16/US-C2C/3290]
  3. ESRI's Energy Policy Research Centre
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [16/US-C2C/3290] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The traditional paradigm of centralised electricity systems is being disrupted by increasing levels of distributed generation. It is unclear as to what level of distributed generation is expected, appropriate or optimal in future power systems. Many researchers have focused on how to integrate distributed generation into centralised electricity systems. Such research tends to consider optimality from narrow viewpoints focused on particular aspects of the electricity network such as the distribution network within the confines of a vision of future electricity systems where centralised infrastructure remains. There is a gap in the literature in considering the role of distributed generation (DG) within the context of the entire electricity system and the wider energy sector and how it can drive the development of an electricity system to maintain a centralised approach or increase decentralisation. This paper explores the factors that influence the role of DG in future electricity systems and the existing tools that can be used to explore how these factors can impact the role of DG considering four future visions for electricity systems each with increasing levels of decentralisation. The review concludes that there is no one tool that can be used to explore all of the factors and their impact on the role of DG. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据