4.7 Article

Nano-encapsulated phase change material slurry (Nano-PCMS) saturated in metal foam: A new stable and efficient strategy for passive thermal management

期刊

ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 743-751

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.147

关键词

Phase change material (PCM); Nano-encapsulated phase change material slurry (Nano-PCMS); Metal foam; Thermal management; Heat transfer enhancement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506180]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102017JG05005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nano-encapsulated phase change material slurry (nano-PCMS) has the merits of high latent heat and high surface area, and overcomes the defects of supercooling and volume expansion that exist in most organic/inorganic PCMs. Subjected to the low thermal conductivity, the thermal management systems using nano-PCMS are highly dependent on slurry's convection coefficient, which cannot be guaranteed in the condition where the natural convection is constrained. Here, this article proposed a novel thermally stable and efficient hybrid PCM that infiltrating nano-PCMS into metal foam for passive thermal management. The experimental results indicated that the addition of metal foam could reduce the heated surface temperature by maximum 38% in regardless of heated angle, while this contribution was 24% achieved by natural convection of pristine nano-PCMS. The flow convection of nano-PCMS was completely suppressed in the foam cells due to the high viscosity of slurry and flow resistance of foam matrix. Higher porosity composite obtained lower heat transfer efficiency and more pronounced thermal non-equilibrium effect attributed to its lower effective thermal conductivity and less interfacial area. This newly-proposed foam/nano-PCMS composite not only provides high heat transfer efficiency, but reduces the dependency on the convection coefficient of nano-PCMS. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据