4.5 Article

Bi-layered porous constructs of PCL-coated 45S5 bioactive glass and electrospun collagen-PCL fibers

期刊

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1215-1226

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-015-9998-5

关键词

Osteochondral region; Electrospinning; In vitro degradation; Bioactivity; Scaffold

资金

  1. European Commission funding under the 7th Framework Programme (Marie Curie Initial Training Networks) [289958]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple yet promising approach to construct bi-layered scaffolds using bioactive ceramics and biodegradable polymers is presented. This method involves two versatile fabrication techniques used in the field of TE: foam replication process and electrospinning. By the foam replication method, three-dimensional 45S5 bioactive glass (BG)-based scaffolds with high porosity, in the range of 95.8 +/- A 0.9 %, were produced. To improve the mechanical properties of the BG scaffolds, dip-coating using polycaprolactone (PCL) was performed, which led to a significant increase in the compressive strength of the scaffolds. In order to develop a bi-layered construct, bead-less submicrometric fibers of collagen-PCL were electrospun over the PCL-coated BG scaffolds. Surface morphology, surface properties and mechanical strength of the bi-layered construct were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy analysis, contact angle measurements and compressive strength testing, respectively. In vitro degradation of the collagen-PCL fibers in phosphate buffered saline and in vitro bioactivity of the bi-layered constructs in simulated body fluid were investigated. Formation of hydroxyapatite on the PCL-coated BG and along the morphology of the collagen-PCL fibers was ascertained using different characterization techniques. The bi-layered construct is intended for interface tissue engineering applications where the PCL-coated BG scaffold, which is highly bioactive, can serve as a support for the bone side and the composite collagen-PCL submicrometric fibers are intended for the cartilage side.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据