4.7 Article

Analysis and optimization of cascade Rankine cycle for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery

期刊

ENERGY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 179-195

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.047

关键词

Cascade Rankine cycle; LNG cold energy recovery; Power generation cycle; Organic Rankine cycle; Exergy efficiency; Economic evaluation

资金

  1. Global Leading Technology Program of the Office of Strategic R&D Planning (OSP)
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new concept called the cascade Rankine cycle, which recovers LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy for power generation, optimizes the cycle by investigating the effects of key parameters on its performance, and compares its thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency and economic evaluation to those of the conventional alternatives. The cascade Rankine cycle consists of multiple stages of the organic Rankine cycle in a layered structure in which the first stage encompasses the second one that, in turn, encompasses the next. Due to its layered configuration, optimization of the cycle is straightforward and involves sequentially optimizing the individual stages. Optimization of the subsequent stages, however, required process simulation considering the equipment efficiency and the thermodynamic properties of the working fluid. Process simulation indicated that the indicators such as net power output, thermal efficiency, and exergy efficiency generally increase as the number of stages increases. These indicators were, however, significantly affected by the thermodynamic properties of the working fluids. The proposed cycles demonstrated significantly better performance in these indicators than the conventional cycles. The three-stage cascade Rankine cycle with propane as the working fluid exhibited the highest net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency within the set. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据