4.5 Article

Synthesis and characterization of silica doped alumina catalyst support with superior thermal stability and unique pore properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 475-487

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-015-0101-z

关键词

Silica-doped alumina; Thermally stable; Large pore size; High surface area

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15666]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-0959862]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, solvent-deficient, one-pot synthesis of a thermally stable silica-doped alumina, having high surface area, large pore volume and uniquely large pores, has been developed. Silica-doped alumina (SDA) was synthesized by adding 5 wt% silica from tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) to aluminum isoproxide (AIP), a 1:5 mol ratio AIP to water, and a 1:2 mol ratio TEOS to water in the absence of a template. The structure of silica-doped alumina was studied by in situ high-temperature powder XRD, nitrogen adsorption, thermogravimetric analysis, solid-state NMR, and TEM. The addition of silica significantly increases the stability of gamma-Al2O3 phase to 1200 A degrees C while maintaining a high surface area, a large pore volume and a large pore diameter. After calcination at 1100 A degrees C for 2 h, a surface area of 160 m(2)/g, pore volume of 0.99 cm(3)/g, and a bimodal pore size distribution of 23 and 52 nm are observed. Compared to a commercial silica-doped alumina, after calcination for 24 h at 1100 A degrees C, the surface area, pore volume, and pore diameter SDA are higher by 46, 155, and 94 %, respectively. Results reveal that Si stabilizes the porous structure of gamma-Al2O3 up to 1200 A degrees C, while unstabilized alumina is stable to only 900 A degrees C. From our data, we infer that Si enters tetrahedral vacancies in the defect spinel structure of alumina without moving Al from tetrahedral positions and forms a silica-alumina interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据