4.7 Article

Parametric analysis of components effectiveness on desiccant cooling system performance

期刊

ENERGY
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 157-166

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.12.019

关键词

Desiccant dehumidification; Evaporative cooling; Air-conditioning; Thermal design

资金

  1. Brazilian government research funding agency CNPq
  2. Brazilian government research funding agency CAPES
  3. Brazilian government research funding agency FAPERJ
  4. Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
  5. Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnologica Celso Suckow da Fonseca (CEFET-Rio)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of studies have been conducted for investigating parameters that influence the performance of desiccant cooling systems. Many of these rely on intricate numerical simulations, especially due to coupled non-linear transport equations associated with a desiccant dehumidifier. In this study, a simple numerical procedure for designing desiccant cooling systems has been employed for analyzing the impact of cycle components' characteristics on the overall system performance. The methodology is based on solving a non-linear algebraic system stemming from heat and mass transfer balances associated with the operation of each component. The required input data involves user-prescribed inlet and room conditions, a regeneration temperature, and cycle components' effectiveness values. With the proposed methodology, results of different cooling cycles are presented in an informative graphical fashion that can readily be used as a design tool for desiccant cooling systems. The results show that COP values clearly over one can be obtained for ideal ventilation cycles, which have 100% heat wheel effectiveness. Nevertheless, a great reduction, by factors of two and higher, are obtained when this effectiveness is reduced to 0.8. In addition, the results show that a 20-30% decrease in dehumidifier performance can lead to 30-50% reduction in the overall ventilation cycle performance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据