4.7 Article

CO2 capture efficiency and energy requirement analysis of power plant using modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle

期刊

ENERGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 1590-1598

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.072

关键词

Modified calcium-based sorbent; Calcination; Carbonation; Post-combustion; CO2 capture

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB705806]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090461205]
  3. Special Funds for Postdoctoral Innovative Projects of Shandong Province, China [200902019]
  4. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (IIFSDU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the average carbonation conversion, CO2 capture efficiency and energy requirement for post-combustion CO2 capture system during the modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle. The limestone modified with acetic acid solution, i.e. calcium acetate is taken as an example of the modified calcium-based sorbents. The modified limestone exhibits much higher average carbonation conversion than the natural sorbent under the same condition. The CO2 capture efficiency increases with the sorbent flow ratios. Compared with the natural limestone, much less makeup mass flow of the recycled and the fresh sorbent is needed for the system when using the modified limestone at the same CO2 capture efficiency. Achieving 0.95 of CO2 capture efficiency without sulfation, 272 kJ/mol CO2 is required in the calciner for the natural limestone, whereas only 223 kJ/mol CO2 for the modified sorbent. The modified limestone possesses greater advantages in CO2 capture efficiency and energy consumption than the natural sorbent. When the sulfation and carbonation of the sorbents take place simultaneously, more energy is required. It is significantly necessary to remove SO2 from the flue gas before it enters the carbonator in order to reduce energy consumption in the calciner. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据