4.6 Article

Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box

期刊

ENDOSCOPY
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 735-744

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365463

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
  2. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard Digestive Diseases Center at Harvard Medical School [DK034854]
  3. Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT)
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and study aims: There is currently no objective and validated methodology available to assess the progress of endoscopy trainees or to determine when technical competence has been achieved. The aims of the current study were to develop an endoscopic part-task simulator and to assess scoring system validity. Methods: Fundamental endoscopic skills were determined via kinematic analysis, literature review, and expert interviews. Simulator prototypes and scoring systems were developed to reflect these skills. Validity evidence for content, internal structure, and response process was evaluated. Results: The final training box consisted of five modules (knob control, torque, retroflexion, polypectomy, and navigation and loop reduction). A total of 5 minutes were permitted per module with extra points for early completion. Content validity index (CVI)-realism was 0.88, CVI-relevance was 1.00, and CVI-representativeness was 0.88, giving a composite CVI of 0.92. Overall, 82% of participants considered the simulator to be capable of differentiating between ability levels, and 93% thought the simulator should be used to assess ability prior to performing procedures in patients. Inter-item assessment revealed correlations from 0.67 to 0.93, suggesting that tasks were sufficiently correlated to assess the same underlying construct, with each task remaining independent. Each module represented 16.0%-26.1% of the total score, suggesting that no module contributed disproportionately to the composite score. Average box scores were 272.6 and 284.4 (P=0.94) when performed sequentially, and average score for all participants with proctor 1 was 297.6 and 308.1 with proctor 2 (P=0.94), suggesting reproducibility and minimal error associated with test administration. Conclusion: A part-task training box and scoring system were developed to assess fundamental endoscopic skills, and validity evidence regarding content, internal structure, and response process was demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据