4.6 Article

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development

期刊

ENDOSCOPY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 664-670

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256413

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for en bloc resection of superficial tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. In France, experience with this technique is still limited. We wanted to assess the development of ESD in France, with special attention to short term outcomes. Patients and methods: Members of the Societe Francaise d'Endoscopie Digestive (SFED) who declared performing ESD reported their cases prospectively on a voluntary basis. Demographic, clinical, and technical data, and the results of immediate complications were collected. Case reports were completed prospectively by each investigator before pooled analysis. Results: A total of 188 consecutive case reports were collected from 16 centers. The median case mix per center was 6 patients (range 1-43). The lesion sites treated by ESD were the stomach (n = 75), esophagus (n = 27), duodenum (n = 1), cecum (n = 2), right colon (n = 3), transverse colon (n = 5), sigmoid (n = 3), and rectum (n = 72). The median size of the lesions was 26 mm (range 2150 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 77.1% of cases, with complete R0 resection in 72.9%. Histopathology results showed high grade dysplasia or superficial cancer in 71.2%. The median duration of ESD was 105 minutes (range 20 - 450 minutes). The short term morbidity was 29.2% including 34 cases of perforation (18.1%), and 21 hemorrhages (11.2%) during the 24 hours following ESD, 89% of which were managed conservatively or endoscopically. Conclusion: In this early experience, the feasibility of ESD appeared to be good but R0 resection and complication rates did not match those reported by Japanese authors and must be improved by an extended practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据