4.5 Article

GH Administration Rescues Fatty Liver Regeneration Impairment by Restoring GH/EGFR Pathway Deficiency

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 155, 期 7, 页码 2545-2554

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2014-1010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association Francaise pour l'Etude du Foie
  2. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GH pathway has been shown to play a major role in liver regeneration through the control of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation. This pathway is down-regulated in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Because regeneration is known to be impaired in fatty livers, we wondered whether a deregulation of the GH/EGFR pathway could explain this deficiency. Hepatic EGFR expression and triglyceride levels were quantified in liver biopsies of 32 obese patients with different degrees of steatosis. We showed a significant inverse correlation between liver EGFR expression and the level of hepatic steatosis. GH/EGFR down-regulation was also demonstrated in 2 steatosis mouse models, a genetic (ob/ob) and a methionine and choline-deficient diet mouse model, in correlation with liver regeneration defect. ob/ob mice exhibited a more severe liver regeneration defect after partial hepatectomy (PH) than methionine and choline-deficient diet-fed mice, a difference that could be explained by a decrease in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 phosphorylation 32 hours after PH. Having checked that GH deficiency accounted for the GH signaling pathway down-regulation in the liver of ob/ob mice, we showed that GH administration in these mice led to a partial rescue in hepatocyte proliferation after PH associated with a concomitant restoration of liver EGFR expression and signal transducer and activator of trnascription 3 activation. In conclusion, we propose that the GH/EGFR pathway down-regulation is a general mechanism responsible for liver regeneration deficiency associated with steatosis, which could be partially rescued by GH administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据