4.5 Article

Reactivation of the Silenced Thyroid Hormone Receptor β Gene Expression Delays Thyroid Tumor Progression

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 154, 期 1, 页码 25-35

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2012-1728

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

That a knock-in mouse harboring a dominant-negative thyroid hormone receptor (TR)-beta (Thrb) mutation develops metastatic thyroid cancer strongly suggests the involvement of TR beta in carcinogenesis. Epigenetic silencing of the THRB gene is common in human cancers. The aim of the present study was to determine how DNA methylation affected the expression of the THRB gene in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and how reexpression of the THRB gene attenuated the cancer phenotypes. We used methylation-specific PCR to examine the expression and promoter methylation of the THRB gene in DTC tissues. Thyroid cancer cells with hypermethylated THRB were treated with the demethylating agents 5'-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5'-aza-CdR) and zebularine to evaluate their impact on the cancer cell phenotypes. THRB mRNA expression in DTC was 90% lower than in normal controls, and this decrease was associated with a higher tumor/lymph node staging. The promoter methylation level of the THRB gene had a significant negative correlation with the expression level of the THRB gene. Treatment of FTC-236 cells with 5'-aza-CdR or zebularine induced reexpression of the THRB gene and inhibited cell proliferation and migration. FTC-236 cells stably expressing TR beta exhibited lower cell proliferation and migration through inhibition of beta-catenin signaling pathways compared with FTC-236 without TR beta. 5'-Aza-CdR also led to suppression of tumor growth in an in vivo xenograft model using FTC-236 cells consistent with the cell-based studies. These finding indicate that TR beta is a tumor suppressor and could be tested as a potential therapeutic target. (Endocrinology 154: 25-35, 2013)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据