4.5 Article

AMPK Activation by Dihydrotestosterone Reduces FSH-Stimulated Cell Proliferation in Rat Granulosa Cells by Inhibiting ERK Signaling Pathway

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 153, 期 6, 页码 2831-2838

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2011-1967

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HD 38424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously reported that 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) inhibits FSH-mediated granulosa cell proliferation by reducing cyclin D2 mRNA expression and blocking cell cycle progression at G1/S phase. The present study investigated the role of AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) in DHT-mediated inhibition of granulosa cell proliferation. Granulosa cells harvested from 3-d estradiol primed immature rats were exposed to different concentrations of DHT (0, 45, and 90 ng/ml) for 24 h. Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated AMPK showed a dose-dependent activation (P <0.05) as evidenced by the increased phosphorylation at thr 172. In addition, time-courses studies (0, 6, 12, and 24 h) using DHT(90 ng/ml) showed a time-dependent increase in AMPK activation with maximum effect at 24 h. FSH inhibited AMPK phosphorylation and promoted granulosa cell proliferation, but pretreatment with DHT(90 ng/ml) for 24 h prior to FSH treatment reduced this effect. Pharmacological activation of AMPK with 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta 4-ribofuranoside abolished FSH-mediated ERK phosphorylation, indicating that AMPK is a negative upstream regulator of ERK. Furthermore, inhibition of AMPK activation by compound C reversed the DHT-mediated reduction in positive cell cycle regulator, cyclin D2, and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation. These results suggest that elevated levels of DHT activate AMPK, which in turn inhibits ERK phosphorylation. Thus, inhibition of ERK phosphorylation by activated AMPK in response to DHT might contribute to decreased granulosa cell mitogenesis and ovulatory dysfunction seen in hyperandrogenic states. (Endocrinology 153: 2831-2838, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据