4.5 Article

PWD/PhJ and WSB/EiJ Mice Are Resistant to Diet-Induced Obesity But Have Abnormal Insulin Secretion

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 152, 期 8, 页码 3005-3017

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2011-0060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Diabetes Association [OG-2-08-2600-SC]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, novel inbred mouse strains that are genetically distinct from the commonly used models have been developed from wild-caught mice. These wild-derived inbred strains have been included in many of the large-scale genomic projects, but their potential as models of altered obesity and diabetes susceptibility has not been assessed. We examined obesity and diabetes-related traits in response to high-fat feeding in two of these strains, PWD/PhJ (PWD) and WSB/EiJ (WSB), in comparison with C57BL/6J (B6). Young PWD mice displayed high fasting insulin levels, although they had normal insulin sensitivity. PWD mice subsequently developed a much milder and delayed-onset obesity compared with B6 mice but became as insulin resistant. PWD mice had a robust first-phase and increased second-phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in vivo, rendering them more glucose tolerant. WSB mice were remarkably resistant to diet-induced obesity and maintained very low fasting insulin throughout the study. WSB mice exhibited more rapid glucose clearance in response to an insulin challenge compared with B6 mice, consistent with their low percent body fat. Interestingly, in the absence of a measurable in vivo insulin secretion, glucose tolerance of WSB mice was better than B6 mice, likely due to their enhanced insulin sensitivity. Thus PWD and WSB are two obesity-resistant strains with unique insulin secretion phenotypes. PWD mice are an interesting model that dissociates hyperinsulinemia from obesity and insulin resistance, whereas WSB mice are a model of extraordinary resistance to a high-fat diet. (Endocrinology 152: 3005-3017, 2011)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据