4.5 Article

Male 41, XXY* Mice as a Model for Klinefelter Syndrome: Hyperactivation of Leydig Cells

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 151, 期 6, 页码 2898-2910

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2009-1396

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG [WI 27-23/1-1]
  2. Medical Faculty Muenster [IMF LU 1 2 03 05]
  3. Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sex chromosome imbalance in males is linked to a supernumerary X chromosome, a condition resulting in Klinefelter syndrome (KS; 47, XXY). KS patients suffer from infertility, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, and cognitive impairments. Mechanisms of KS pathophysiology are poorly understood and require further exploration using animal models. Therefore, we phenotypically characterized 41, XXY* mice of different ages, evaluated observed germ cell loss, studied X-inactivation, and focused on the previously postulated impaired Leydig cell maturation and function as a possible cause of the underandrogenization seen in KS. Xist methylation analysis revealed normal X-chromosome inactivation similar to that seen in females. Germ cell loss was found to be complete and to occur during the peripubertal phase. Significantly elevated FSH and LH levels were persistent in 41, XXY* mice of different ages. Although Leydig cell hyperplasia was prominent, isolated XXY* Leydig cells showed a mature mRNA expression profile and a significantly higher transcriptional activity compared with controls. Stimulation of XXY* Leydig cells in vitro by human chorionic gonadotropin indicated a mature LH receptor whose maximal response exceeded that of control Leydig cells. The hyperactivity of Leydig cells seen in XXY* mice suggests that the changes in the endocrine milieu observed in KS is not due to impaired Leydig cell function. We suggest that the embedding of Leydig cells into the changed testicular environment in 41 XXY* males as such influences their endocrine function. (Endocrinology 151: 2898-2910, 2010)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据