4.5 Article

The RAPID Method for Blood Processing Yields New Insight in Plasma Concentrations and Molecular Forms of Circulating Gut Peptides

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 150, 期 11, 页码 5113-5118

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2009-0697

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [STE 1765/1-1, GO 1718/1-1]
  2. National Institutes of Health Center [DK-41301, RO1 DK 33850, DK 56805]
  3. Veterans Administration Research Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The correct identification of circulating molecular forms and measurement of peptide levels in blood entails that the endocrine peptide being studied is stable and recovered in good yields during blood processing. However, it is not clear whether this is achieved in studies using standard blood processing. Therefore, we compared peptide concentration and form of 12 I-125-labeled peptides using the standard procedure (EDTA-blood on ice) and a new method employing Reduced temperatures, Acidification, Protease inhibition, Isotopic exogenous controls, and Dilution (RAPID). During standard processing there was at least 80% loss for calcitonin-gene-related peptide and cholecystokinin-58 (CCK-58) and more than 35% loss for amylin, insulin, peptide YY forms (PYY(1-36) and PYY(3-36)), and somatostatin-28. In contrast, the RAPID method significantly improved the recovery for 11 of 12 peptides (P < 0.05) and eliminated the breakdown of endocrine peptides occurring after standard processing as reflected in radically changed molecular forms for CCK-58, gastrin-releasing peptide, somatostatin-28, and ghrelin. For endogenous ghrelin, this led to an acyl/total ghrelin ratio of 1: 5 instead of 1: 19 by the standard method. These results show that the RAPID method enables accurate assessment of circulating gut peptide concentrations and forms such as CCK-58, acylated ghrelin, and somatostatin-28. Therefore, the RAPID method represents an efficacious means to detect circulating variations in peptide concentrations and form relevant to the understanding of physiological function of endocrine peptides. (Endocrinology 150: 5113-5118, 2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据