4.5 Article

Interleukin-6 inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand-induced osteoclastogenesis by diverting cells into the macrophage lineage:: Key role of Serine727 phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 149, 期 7, 页码 3688-3697

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2007-1719

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoclasts are bone-resorptive cells that differentiate from hematopoietic precursors upon receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) activation. Previous studies demonstrated that IL-6 indirectly stimulates osteoclastogenesis through the production of RANKL by osteoblasts. However, few data described the direct effect of IL-6 on osteoclasts. To investigate this effect, we used several models: murine RAW264.7 cells, mouse bone marrow, and human blood monocytes. In the three models used, the addition of IL-6 inhibited RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Furthermore, IL-6 decreased the expression of osteoclast markers and up-modulated macrophage markers. To elucidate this inhibition, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3, the main signaling molecule activated by IL-6, was analyzed. Addition of two STAT3 inhibitors completely abolished RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis, revealing a key role of STAT3. We demonstrated that a basal level of phosphorylated-STAT3 on Serine(727) associated with an absence of phosphorylation on Tyrosine(705) is essential for osteoclastogenesis. Furthermore, a decrease of Serine(727) phosphorylation led to an inhibition of osteoclast differentiation, whereas an increase of Tyrosine(705) phosphorylation upon IL-6 stimulation led to the formation of macrophages instead of osteoclasts. In conclusion, we showed for the first time that IL-6 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by diverting cells into the macrophage lineage, and demonstrated the functional role of activated-STAT3 and its form of phosphorylation in the control of osteoclastogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据