4.4 Article

Lower levels of TSH are associated with a lower risk of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodular disease: thyroid autonomy may play a protective role

期刊

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 1251-1260

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/ERC-09-0036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian 'Ministero dell'Universita e della Riceica Scientifica' (MURST) [2007 MAPS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher TSH values, even within normal ranges, have been associated with a greater risk of thyroid malignancy The relationship between TSH and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has been analyzed in 10 178 patients submitted to fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules with a cytology of PTC (n=497) or benign thyroid nodular disease (BTND, n=9681). In 942 patients, submitted to surgery (521 from BTND and 421 from PTC), the histological diagnosis confirmed an elevated specificity (99.6%) and sensitivity (98.1%) of cytology. TSH levels were significantly higher in PTC than in BTND both in the cytological and histological series and also in patients with a clinical diagnosis of multinodular goiter (MNG) and single/isolate nodule (S/I). A significant age-dependent development of thyroid autonomy (TSH <0.4 mu U/ml) was observed in patients with benign thyroid disease, but not in those with PTC, diagnosed both on cytology and histology In patients with MNG, the frequency of thyroid autonomy was higher and the risk of PTC was lower compared to those with S/I In all patients, the presence of thyroid auto-antibodies (TAb) was associated with a significant increase of TSH However, both in TAb positive and TAb negative patients TSH levels were significantly higher in PTC than in BTND Our data confirm a direct relationship between TSH levels and risk of PTC in patients with nodular thyroid diseases. Thyroid autonomy conceivably protects against the risk of PTC, while thyroid autoimmunity does not play a significant role Endocrine-Related Cancer (2009) 16 1251-1260

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据