4.6 Review

Genetic Syndromes of Severe Insulin Resistance

期刊

ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 498-514

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/er.2010-0020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [080952/Z/06/Z, 078986/Z/06/Z]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. UK National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  4. UK Medical Research Council Centre for Obesity and Related Metabolic Disease
  5. Wellcome Trust [078986/Z/06/Z, 080952/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin resistance is among the most prevalent endocrine derangements in the world, and it is closely associated with major diseases of global reach including diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and ovulatory dysfunction. It is most commonly found in those with obesity but may also occur in an unusually severe form in rare patients with monogenic defects. Such patients may loosely be grouped into those with primary disorders of insulin signaling and those with defects in adipose tissue development or function (lipodystrophy). The severe insulin resistance of both subgroups puts patients at risk of accelerated complications and poses severe challenges in clinical management. However, the clinical disorders produced by different genetic defects are often biochemically and clinically distinct and are associated with distinct risks of complications. This means that optimal management of affected patients should take into account the specific natural history of each condition. In clinical practice, they are often underdiagnosed, however, with low rates of identification of the underlying genetic defect, a problem compounded by confusing and overlapping nomenclature and classification. We now review recent developments in understanding of genetic forms of severe insulin resistance and/or lipodystrophy and suggest a revised classification based on growing knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology. (Endocrine Reviews 32: 498-514, 2011)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据