4.6 Review

Clinical, agricultural, and evolutionary biology of myostatin: A comparative review

期刊

ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 513-534

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/er.2008-0003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [1R03AR051917, R03 AR051917] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of myostatin and our introduction to the Mighty Mouse over a decade ago spurred both basic and applied research and impacted popular culture as well. The myostatin-null genotype produces double muscling in mice and livestock and was recently described in a child. The field's rapid growth is by no means surprising considering the potential benefits of enhancing muscle growth in clinical and agricultural settings. Indeed, several recent studies suggest that blocking myostatin's inhibitory effects could improve the clinical treatment of several muscle growth disorders, whereas comparative studies suggest that these actions are at least partly conserved. Thus, neutralizing myostatin's effects could also have agricultural significance. Extrapolating between studies that use different vertebrate models, particularly fish and mammals, is somewhat confusing because whole genome duplication events have resulted in the production and retention of up to four unique myostatin genes in some fish species. Such comparisons, however, suggest that myostatin's actions may not be limited to skeletal muscle per se, but may additionally influence other tissues including cardiac muscle, adipocytes, and the brain. Thus, therapeutic intervention in the clinic or on the farm must consider the potential of alternative side effects that could impact these or other tissues. In addition, the presence of multiple and actively diversifying myostatin genes in most fish species provides a unique opportunity to study adaptive molecular evolution. It may also provide insight into myostatin's nonmuscle actions as results from these and other comparative studies gain visibility in biomedical fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据