4.5 Article

CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS PRAMLINTIDE INFUSION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES: OBSERVATIONS FROM A PILOT STUDY

期刊

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 689-695

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLIN ENDOCRINOL
DOI: 10.4158/EP09044.ORR1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous (basal-bolus) subcutaneous pramlintide infusion (CSPI) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Methods: A 16-week, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolled 11 patients (mean SD values: age, 39.9 +/- 4.0 years; hemoglobin A1c, 8.20% +/- 0.60%; weight, 92.3 +/- 18.4 kg; body mass index, 29.7 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2)) with long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus (20.7 +/- 1.3 years; duration of pump therapy, 9.5 +/- 6.0 years). Pramlintide basal infusion was begun with continuous subcutaneous infusion at 9 mu g/h. After 3 days, premeal bolus doses of pramlintide were initiated at 15 mu g, and titrated to 60 mu g per meal. Basal and bolus insulin doses were reduced 10% on initiation of CSPI and adjusted thereafter as needed to prevent hypoglycemia. Results: After 16 weeks of pramlintide therapy, mean +/- SD hemoglobin A1c decreased to 7.85% +/- 0.74% (-0.35%). The fasting glucose level declined from 198.2 +/- 66.9 mg/dL to 135.8 +/- 63.9 mg/dL. The mean weight decreased to 91.8 +/- 20.1 kg (-0.5 kg) at week 12. The daily bolus insulin requirement decreased 20%; daily basal insulin was unchanged (27.7 +/- 11.7 U). All patients experienced mild postprandial hypoglycemia, but no severe hypoglycemia was reported. Three of the 11 study participants experienced mild initial nausea, but all patients successfully titrated bolus doses to 60 mu g within 3 weeks. Conclusion: In this pilot study of 11 patients with type I diabetes using insulin pumps, CSPI seemed safe and well tolerated, did not alter pramlintide pharmacokinetic variables, and reduced fasting glucose levels. Larger studies of this method for pramlintide administration seem warranted. (Endocr Pract. 2009; 15:689-695)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据