4.4 Article

Immunohistochemical Analysis of 11-β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 and Glucocorticoid Receptor in Subclinical Cushing's Disease due to Pituitary Macroadenoma

期刊

ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 252-260

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12022-008-9052-0

关键词

subclinical Cushing's disease; pituitary macroadenoma; 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2; glucocorticoid receptor; ACTH; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subclinical Cushing's disease (SCD) is characterized by lack of clinically evident Cushingoid features, despite abnormal hypersecretion of ACTH. Nearly half the cases of SCD are due to macroadenomas, and in the majority of them, ACTH secretion is not inhibited even by high-dose dexamethasone. Impaired glucocorticoid (GC) action may be correlated with the proliferation and development of pituitary macroadenomas causing SCD. In this study, immunohistochemical analysis of the resected tumors were performed to evaluate the expression of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11 beta HSD2) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in pituitary tissues obtained from two SCD (macroadenomas), eight Cushing's disease (CD) (microadenomas), nine acromegaly, and nine normal pituitary (NP). Scattered 11 beta HSD2-immunopositive cells were detected in all NP tissues, but its immunoreactivity was totally absent in any tumorous tissues except two CD. Scattered GR-immunopositive cells were also detected and GR immunostaining was restricted to the cytosol in NP tissue. In contrast, GR-immunopositive cells were abundantly present and GR immunostaining was restricted to the nucleus in all the tumorous tissues. There were marked differences in both expression levels and localization between NP tissues and all the tumors. There may be a mechanism other than that via 11 beta HSD2 for causes of impaired negative feedback action by GC in SCD and CD, but results of our present study suggest that impaired GC action may be involved, at least in part, in tumorigenesis of SCD and CD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据