4.2 Article

Elevated circulating levels of CTRP1, a novel adipokine, in diabetic patients

期刊

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
卷 61, 期 9, 页码 841-847

出版社

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0016

关键词

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CTRP1; TNF-alpha; Adiponectin

资金

  1. Henan Medical Research Foundation of Henan Health Department [201002010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1 (CTRP1), an adipose tissue-derived adipokine has been shown to decrease blood glucose levels and to improve metabolism of glucose in mice. In addition, CTRP1 has exhibited significant association with BMI, adiponectin and TNF-alpha in diabetic animal models. However, there are no published studies addressing CTRP1 levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, it was of interest to evaluate plasma CTRP1 levels and associated clinical parameters and biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes. 135 subjects were recruited to this study, including 62 type 2 diabetic patients (DM group) and 73 healthy subjects (control group). We measured biochemical parameters, CTRP1, TNF-alpha and adiponectin using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plasma CTRP1 levels showed a significant difference between the DM group and the control group (646.3 +/- 154.4 ng/mL vs. 442.6 +/- 165.4 ng/mL, p<0.01). In addition, CTRP1 was strongly positively associated with BMI, glucose levels, HbA1c, HOMA-IR and TNF-alpha in diabetic patients. CTRP1 showed negative correlation with adiponectin. In Multivariate regression analysis, CTRP1 was strongly independently associated with diabetes when CTRP1 levels were analyzed by both as a continuous variable and quartile (OR: 1.009, 95%CI: 1.004-1.015,p<0.05; OR: 2.443, 95%CI: 1.379-4.182,p<0.01, respectively). Increased plasma CTRP1 was independently associated with type 2 diabetes. Profiling of plasma adipokines such as CTRP1 is particularly important to obtain a greater understanding of their contribution to the type 2 diabetic state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据