4.7 Article

Root based responses account for Psidium guajava survival at high nickel concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 137-146

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.10.011

关键词

Ion fluxes; Phytostabilization; Impedance spectroscopy; Gas exchange; Heavy metals

资金

  1. Italian Defense Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of Psidium guajava in polluted environments has been reported in recent studies, suggesting that this species has a high tolerance to the metal stress. The present study aims at a physiological characterization of P. guajava response to high nickel (Ni) concentrations in the root-zone. Three hydroponic experiments were carried out to characterize the effects of toxic Ni concentrations on morphological and physiological parameters of P. guajava, focusing on Ni-induced damages at the root-level and root ion fluxes. With up to 300 mu M NiSO4 in the root-zone, plant growth was similar to that in control plants, whereas at concentrations higher than 1000 mu M NiSO4 there was a progressive decline in plant growth and leaf gas exchange parameters; this occurred despite, at all considered concentrations, plants limited Ni2+ translocation to the shoot, therefore avoiding shoot Ni2+ toxicity symptoms. Maintenance of plant growth with 300 mu M Ni2+ was associated with the ability to retain K+ in the roots meanwhile 1000 and 3000 mu M NiSO4 led to substantial K+ losses. In this study, root responses mirror all plant performances suggesting a direct link between root functionality and Ni2+ tolerance mechanisms and plant survival. Considering that Ni was mainly accumulated in the root system, the potential use of P. guajava for Ni2+ phytoextraction in metal-polluted soils is limited; nevertheless, the observed physiological changes indicate a good Ni2+ tolerance up to 300 mu M NiSO4 suggesting a potential role for the phytostabilization of polluted soils. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据