4.2 Article

Exenatide Exhibits Dose-Dependent Effects on Glycemic Control over 12 Weeks in Japanese Patients with Suboptimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 415-424

出版社

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.K08E-296

关键词

Exenatide; Dose response; Glycemic control; Japan; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (San Diego, California, United States)
  2. Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, Indiana, United States)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the dose-dependent efficacy and safety of exenatide over 12 weeks in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled despite therapeutic doses of sulfonylurea (SU), SU plus biguanide, or SU plus thiazolidinedione. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (N = 40), 2.5 mu g (N = 38), 5 mu g (N = 37), or 10 mu g (N = 38) exenatide administered subcutaneously twice daily (BID). Patients randomly assigned to 10 mu g exenatide received 5 mu g BID for the first 4 weeks, with the dose escalated to 10 mu g BID for the final 8 weeks. Patients were 60.3 +/- 9.7 years old, with body mass index 25.3 +/- 4.3 kg/m(2) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.0 +/- 0.8%. Baseline-to-endpoint HbA1c changes (%) were +0.02 +/- 0.1 (placebo), -0.9 +/- 0.1 (2.5 mu g), - 1.2 +/- 0.1 (5 mu g), and - 1.4 +/- 0.1 (10 mu g) (all p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Of patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7%, 5.1 % (placebo), 50.0% (2.5 mu g), 71.4% (5 mu g), and 79.4% (10 mu g) achieved H bA1c <7% at endpoint (p < 0.00 1, trend test). Basel ine-to-endpoint fasting plasma glucose changes (mg/dL) were +6.0 +/- 4.8 (placebo), - 18.6 +/- 5.7 (2.5 mu g), -25.0 +/- 7.0 (5 mu g), and -28.9 +/- 5.9 (10 mu g) (all p <= 0.001 vs. placebo). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild; dose-dependent increases in incidence were observed for hypoglycemia, nausea, anorexia, decreased appetite, and diarrhea (all p <= 0.044, trend test). Over 12 weeks, exenatide dose-dependently improved glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据