4.2 Review

The impacts of fire on birds in Australia's tropical savannas

期刊

EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 319-352

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1071/MU12109

关键词

conservation; conservation management; frugivore; granivore; ground-nesting; hollow-nesting; management; pastoralism; rainforest; threatened species

资金

  1. Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre
  2. National Environmental Research Program North Australian Hub
  3. Australian Wildlife Conservancy
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. Western Australian government's Kimberley Science and Conservation Strategy
  6. Parks Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ecology of Australia's tropical savannas is shaped by the near-pervasive influence of fire. Constituting similar to 20% of Australia's land area, tropical savannas contribute >75% of the area burnt in Australia each year. Across most of Australia's tropical savannas, components of biodiversity are declining, including many species of birds. This review seeks to assess whether that decline is linked to current fire regimes. However, relevant studies are few, short-term and opportunistic, and indicate rather than demonstrate the effects of fire. There is no set of agreed paradigms for contextualising the relationship between birds and fire regimes in this region or for any management consequences. We conclude that the current fire regime is suboptimal for many species of birds, particularly for granivores, frugivores, hollow-dependent species and those that nest on or near the ground. For conservation reserves, we recommend that fire management protocols include the explicit targets that: (1) at least 25% of the savanna landscape is at least 3 years unburnt; (2) at least 5% is at least 10 years unburnt; (3) fire-sensitive non-savanna vegetation types are increasing or stable and (4) populations of selected hollow-nesting, ground-nesting, frugivorous and granivorous birds are increasing or stable. We also identify key knowledge gaps that currently inhibit conservation management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据