4.2 Review

Relative influence of habitat modification and interspecific competition on woodland bird assemblages in eastern Australia

期刊

EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 40-51

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1071/MU09108

关键词

fragmentation; grazing; habitat structure; Manorina; Noisy Miner; patch area; Yellow-throated Miner

资金

  1. Land and Water Australia Native Vegetation and Biodiversity Program [USQ12]
  2. ARC [LP0775264]
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award
  4. CSIRO
  5. Stuart Leslie Bird Research Award
  6. Birds Queensland
  7. Crows Nest Shire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many of eastern Australia's woodland birds have declined in recent decades. Although historical landscape transformation ultimately underlies these declines, effective conservation action requires knowledge of the relative importance of current threats to woodland birds. Through a literature review and analysis of empirical data from seven woodland regions, we investigated the relative importance of habitat structure, site context and aggressive avian competitors (miners, Manorina spp.) for woodland birds in eastern Australia. The literature review revealed that the factor which most consistently influenced the richness, abundance and assemblage composition of woodland birds was the density or presence of Manorina honeyeaters. A positive effect of site structural complexity was also often reported, but the effects of area, isolation and grazing varied among the reviewed studies. Across the seven empirical datasets, density of Manorina honeyeaters was responsible for the great majority of the independently explained variance in all but one region. We conclude that interspecific competition with Manorina honeyeaters is one of the most important and widespread processes threatening woodland birds in eastern Australia. In regions where this threatening process is prevalent, the greatest conservation gains for woodland birds may therefore be achieved by focussing on reducing habitat suitability for aggressive Manorina honeyeaters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据