4.5 Article

Immobilization of soil copper using organic and inorganic amendments

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 112-117

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201400400

关键词

stabilization; geochemical fractionation; metal mobilization; soil additives; vineyard soil

资金

  1. Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (ParOwn fellowship)
  2. German Academic Exchange Foundation (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  3. DAAD-WAP) [A/14/05113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experiment aimed to immobilize Cu in polluted agricultural soils via the application of agrochemicals to reduce its bioavailability to plants. A greenhouse pot experiment was established using a Cu contaminated vineyard topsoil collected from a farm in Greece. The soil was mixed with inorganic [i.e., zeolite (Z), Al-oxide (AX), Mn-oxide (MX), and phosphate rock (PR)] as well as organic amendments [i.e., activated charcoal (AC), commercial peat soil material (CP), and compost from olive oil processing wastes (COW)] with an application rate of 2.5% and cultivated by corn (Zea maize). After plant harvesting, Cu was measured separately in the aboveground biomass and roots, respectively, whereas the soil samples were analyzed for DTPA-extractable and geochemical fractions of Cu (soluble + exchangeable fraction, sorbed and carbonate fraction, Fe-/Mn-oxides fraction, and organic fraction). The immobilizing agents, except MX, reduced the soluble plus exchangeable Cu in the treated soil. The lowest concentrations of the soluble plus exchangeable Cu occurred in the soil amended with AC followed by CP, AX, COW, PR, and Z, respectively. The amendments decreased the uptake of Cu by corn. Concentrations of Cu were between 11 and 38% lower in the above ground biomass and 19 and 48% lower in the roots than the control. The organic amendments were more effective than the inorganic additives. The AC was the most effective organic additive and AX was the most effective inorganic amendment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据