4.7 Article

SNARE and regulatory proteins induce local membrane protrusions to prime docked vesicles for fast calcium-triggered fusion

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 308-314

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/embr.201337807

关键词

SNARE-mediated membrane fusion; cryo-electron microscopy; membrane curvature; in vitro reconstitution; cryo-electron tomography

资金

  1. EMBL
  2. Chica und Heinz Schaller Stiftung
  3. German Research Foundation [SFB/TRR 83]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abstract Synaptic vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane in response to Ca2+ influx, thereby releasing neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft. The protein machinery that mediates this process, consisting of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) and regulatory proteins, is well known, but the mechanisms by which these proteins prime synaptic membranes for fusion are debated. In this study, we applied large-scale, automated cryo-electron tomography to image an in vitro system that reconstitutes synaptic fusion. Our findings suggest that upon docking and priming of vesicles for fast Ca-2(+)-triggered fusion, SNARE proteins act in concert with regulatory proteins to induce a local protrusion in the plasma membrane, directed towards the primed vesicle. The SNAREs and regulatory proteins thereby stabilize the membrane in a high-energy state from which the activation energy for fusion is profoundly reduced, allowing synchronous and instantaneous fusion upon release of the complexin clamp. Synopsis image Cryo-electron tomography of regulated SNARE-mediated membrane fusion shows that synaptic vesicles induce a protrusion in the target membrane that may prime them for fusion. Vesicles that are docked and primed for fusion in vitro are shown in an intermediate state characterized by a protrusion in the target membrane. High local membrane curvature of the protrusion may represent a high-energy state from which fast, coordinated fusion can occur upon Ca2+ activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据