4.7 Article

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease-associated mutants of GDAP1 dissociate its roles in peroxisomal and mitochondrial fission

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 545-552

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2013.56

关键词

glutathione S-transferase; mitochondrial dynamics; peripheral neuropathy; tail-anchored protein

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. National Center for Competence in Research (NCCR) Neural Plasticity and Repair
  3. BBSRC [BB/K006231/1]
  4. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
  5. Fundo Europeu De Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) [PTDC/SAU-OSM/103647/2008, PTDC/BIA-BCM/118605/2010, SFRH/BD/73532/2010]
  6. BBSRC [BB/K006231/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K006231/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIA-BCM/118605/2010, PTDC/SAU-OSM/103647/2008, SFRH/BD/73532/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria and peroxisomes can be fragmented by the process of fission. The fission machineries of both organelles share a set of proteins. GDAP1 is a tail-anchored protein of mitochondria and induces mitochondrial fragmentation. Mutations in GDAP1 lead to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), an inherited peripheral neuropathy, and affect mitochondrial dynamics. Here, we show that GDAP1 is also targeted to peroxisomes mediated by the import receptor Pex19. Knockdown of GDAP1 leads to peroxisomal elongation that can be rescued by re-expressing GDAP1 and by missense mutated forms found in CMT patients. GDAP1-induced peroxisomal fission is dependent on the integrity of its hydrophobic domain 1, and on Drp1 and Mff, as is mitochondrial fission. Thus, GDAP1 regulates mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission by a similar mechanism. However, our results reveal also a more critical role of the amino-terminal GDAP1 domains, carrying most CMT-causing mutations, in the regulation of mitochondrial compared to peroxisomal fission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据