4.3 Article

Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment

期刊

ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 91-98

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.05.006

关键词

Three-dimensional; Virtual reality; Neuroanatomy; Medical education; Medical students; Anatomical models; Dextrobeam; Third ventricle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) computer graphics are increasingly used to supplement the teaching of anatomy. While most systems consist of a program which produces 3D renderings on a workstation with a standard screen, the Dextrobeam virtual reality VR environment allows the presentation of spatial neuroanatomical models to larger groups of students through a stereoscopic projection system. Materials and methods: Second-year medical students (n = 169) were randomly allocated to receive a standardised pre-recorded audio lecture detailing the anatomy of the third ventricle accompanied by either a two-dimensional (2D) PowerPoint presentation (n = 80) or a 3D animated tour of the third ventricle with the DextroBeam. Students completed a 10-question multiple-choice exam based on the content learned and a subjective evaluation of the teaching method immediately after the lecture. Results: Students in the 2D group achieved a mean score of 5.19 (+/- 2.12) compared to 5.45 (+/- 2.16) in the 3D group, with the results in the 3D group statistically non-inferior to those of the 2D group (p < 0.0001). The students rated the 3D method superior to 2D teaching in four domains (spatial understanding, application in future anatomy classes, effectiveness, enjoyableness) (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Stereoscopically enhanced 3D lectures are valid methods of imparting neuroanatomical knowledge and are well received by students. More research is required to define and develop the role of large-group VR systems in modern neuroanatomy curricula. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据