4.7 Article

The uterine and vascular actions of estetrol delineate a distinctive profile of estrogen receptor α modulation, uncoupling nuclear and membrane activation

期刊

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 1328-1346

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201404112

关键词

endothelium; estetrol; estrogen receptor; uterus

资金

  1. INSERM, Universite de Toulouse III [U1048]
  2. Faculte de Medecine Toulouse-Rangueil
  3. Fondation de France
  4. Conseil Regional Midi-Pyrenees
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  6. Groupe de Reflexion sur la Recherche Cardiovasculaire
  7. CNRS
  8. region Midi-Pyrenees
  9. European structural funds
  10. INSERM [U1083-CNRS-UMR 6214]
  11. CHU
  12. Universite d'Angers
  13. Fondation de l'Avenir
  14. Conseil Regional Pays de la Loire
  15. F.R.S.-FNRS (Belgium)
  16. SPW (Belgium) [DGO6]
  17. IUAP (Belspo, Belgium)
  18. National Institutes of Health [PHS5R01 DK015556]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estetrol (E-4) is a natural estrogen with a long half-life produced only by the human fetal liver during pregnancy. The crystal structures of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) ligand-binding domain bound to 17 beta-estradiol (E-2) and E-4 are very similar, as well as their capacity to activate the two activation functions AF-1 and AF-2 and to recruit the coactivator SRC3. In vivo administration of high doses of E-4 stimulated uterine gene expression, epithelial proliferation, and prevented atheroma, three recognized nuclear ER alpha actions. However, E-4 failed to promote endothelial NO synthase activation and acceleration of endothelial healing, two processes clearly dependent on membrane-initiated steroid signaling (MISS). Furthermore, E-4 antagonized E-2 MISS-dependent effects in endothelium but also in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. This profile of ER alpha activation by E-4, uncoupling nuclear and membrane activation, characterizes E-4 as a selective ER modulator which could have medical applications that should now be considered further.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据