4.7 Article

Sox2 promotes tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells

期刊

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 66-79

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201303411

关键词

wnt signalling; stem cells; Sox2; breast cancer; tamoxifen resistance

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2011-30494]
  2. Institute of Health Carlos III [PI11/02251]
  3. Department of Education of the Government of the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country [PI2009-7]
  4. Department of Health of the Government of the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country [2010-111060]
  5. Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade (Etortek)
  6. Department of Innovation Technology of the Government of the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country
  7. SES-PM (Spanish Society of Breast Pathology)
  8. Foundation La Caixa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of resistance to therapy continues to be a serious clinical problem in breast cancer management. Cancer stem/progenitor cells have been shown to play roles in resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Here, we examined their role in the development of resistance to the oestrogen receptor antagonist tamoxifen. Tamoxifen-resistant cells were enriched for stem/progenitors and expressed high levels of the stem cell marker Sox2. Silencing of the SOX2 gene reduced the size of the stem/progenitor cell population and restored sensitivity to tamoxifen. Conversely, ectopic expression of Sox2 reduced tamoxifen sensitivity in vitroandin vivo. Gene expression profiling revealed activation of the Wnt signalling pathway in Sox2-expressing cells, and inhibition of Wnt signalling sensitized resistant cells to tamoxifen. Examination of patient tumours indicated that Sox2 levels are higher in patients after endocrine therapy failure, and also in the primary tumours of these patients, compared to those of responders. Together, these results suggest that development of tamoxifen resistance is driven by Sox2-dependent activation of Wnt signalling in cancer stem/progenitor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据