4.8 Article

Determinants of G quadruplex-induced epigenetic instability in REV1-deficient cells

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 21, 页码 2507-2520

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201488398

关键词

epigenetic memory; G quadruplex; histone modifications; replication; REV1

资金

  1. Association for International Cancer Research
  2. EMBO
  3. Fanconi Anemia Research Fund
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Wellcome Trust TMAT
  6. Medical Research Council [U105178808]
  7. ARC
  8. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  9. Cancer Research UK
  10. MRC [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Cancer Research UK [11961] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178808] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Worldwide Cancer Research [11-0514] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

REV1-deficient chicken DT40 cells are compromised in replicating G quadruplex (G4)-forming DNA. This results in localised, stochastic loss of parental chromatin marks and changes in gene expression. We previously proposed that this epigenetic instability arises from G4-induced replication fork stalls disrupting the accurate propagation of chromatin structure through replication. Here, we test this model by showing that a single G4 motif is responsible for the epigenetic instability of the BU-1 locus in REV1-deficient cells, despite its location 3.5kb from the transcription start site (TSS). The effect of the G4 is dependent on it residing on the leading strand template, but is independent of its in vitro thermal stability. Moving the motif to more than 4kb from the TSS stabilises expression of the gene. However, loss of histone modifications (H3K4me3 and H3K9/14ac) around the transcription start site correlates with the position of the G4 motif, expression being lost only when the promoter is affected. This supports the idea that processive replication is required to maintain the histone modification pattern and full transcription of this model locus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据