4.8 Article

A novel miR-155/miR-143 cascade controls glycolysis by regulating hexokinase 2 in breast cancer cells

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1985-1998

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.45

关键词

aerobic glycolysis; hexokinase 2; inflammation; microRNA-155; microRNA-143; the Warburg effect

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB910802, 2011CB811303, 2011CB966304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90919016, 30970621, 31170754]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX1-YW-R-64, KSCX2-YW-R-096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cells preferentially metabolize glucose through aerobic glycolysis. This phenomenon, known as the Warburg effect, is an anomalous characteristic of glucose metabolism in cancer cells. Chronic inflammation is a key promoting factor of tumourigenesis. It remains, however, largely unexplored whether and how pro-tumourigenic inflammation regulates glucose metabolism in cancer cells. Here, we show that pro-inflammatory cytokines promote glycolysis in breast cancer cells, and that the inflammation- induced miR-155 functions as an important mediator in this process. We further show that miR-155 acts to upregulate hexokinase 2 (hk2), through two distinct mechanisms. First, miR-155 promotes hk2 transcription by activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a transcriptional activator for hk2. Second, via targeting C/EBP beta (a transcriptional activator for mir143), miR-155 represses mir-143, a negative regulator of hk2, thus resulting in upregulation of hk2 expression at the post-transcriptional level. The miR-155-mediated hk2 upregulation also appears to operate in other types of cancer cells examined. We suggest that the miR-155/miR-143/HK2 axis may represent a common mechanism linking inflammation to the altered metabolism in cancer cells. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 1985-1998. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.45; Published online 21 February 2012 Subject Categories: signal transduction; molecular biology of disease

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据