4.8 Article

Alternating access mechanism in the POT family of oligopeptide transporters

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 31, 期 16, 页码 3411-3421

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.157

关键词

alternating access mechanism; major facilitator superfamily; peptide transport; PepT1; POT family

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) [G0900399]
  2. Wellcome Trust [062164/Z/00/Z]
  3. Royal Society
  4. BBSRC [BB/G023425/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0900399] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G023425/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0900399] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short chain peptides are actively transported across membranes as an efficient route for dietary protein absorption and for maintaining cellular homeostasis. In mammals, peptide transport occurs via PepT1 and PepT2, which belong to the proton-dependent oligopeptide transporter, or POT family. The recent crystal structure of a bacterial POT transporter confirmed that they belong to the major facilitator superfamily of secondary active transporters. Despite the functional characterization of POT family members in bacteria, fungi and mammals, a detailed model for peptide recognition and transport remains unavailable. In this study, we report the 3.3-angstrom resolution crystal structure and functional characterization of a POT family transporter from the bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Crystallized in an inward open conformation the structure identifies a hinge-like movement within the C-terminal half of the transporter that facilitates opening of an intracellular gate controlling access to a central peptide-binding site. Our associated functional data support a model for peptide transport that highlights the importance of salt bridge interactions in orchestrating alternating access within the POT family. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 3411-3421. doi:10.1038/emboj. 2012.157; Published online 1 June 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据