4.8 Article

IRF6 is a mediator of Notch pro-differentiation and tumour suppressive function in keratinocytes

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 22, 页码 4571-4585

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.325

关键词

keratinocytes; Notch; p63; squamous cell carcinoma; tumour suppression

资金

  1. NIH [AR39190, AR054856]
  2. European Union [LSHB-CT-2005-019067]
  3. Swiss National Foundation [3100A0-122281/1]
  4. Oncosuisse [02361-02-2009]
  5. Olga-Mayenfisch-Stiftung
  6. Wellcome Trust [082868]
  7. MRC [G 0901539]
  8. MRC [G0901539] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0901539] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the pro-differentiation and tumour suppressive functions of Notch signalling in keratinocytes are well established, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We report here that interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6), an IRF family member with an essential role in epidermal development, is induced in differentiation through a Notch-dependent mechanism and is a primary Notch target in keratinocytes and keratinocyte-derived SCC cells. Increased IRF6 expression contributes to the impact of Notch activation on growth/differentiation-related genes, while it is not required for induction of 'canonical' Notch targets like p21 WAF1/Cip1, Hes1 and Hey1. Down-modulation of IRF6 counteracts differentiation of primary human keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo, promoting ras-induced tumour formation. The clinical relevance of these findings is illustrated by the strikingly opposite pattern of expression of Notch1 and IRF6 versus epidermal growth factor receptor in a cohort of clinical SCCs, as a function of their grade of differentiation. Thus, IRF6 is a primary Notch target in keratinocytes, which contributes to the role of this pathway in differentiation and tumour suppression. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 4571-4585. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.325; Published online 9 September 2011 Subject Categories: signal transduction; molecular biology of disease

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据