4.8 Article

Neuronal CCL21 up-regulates microglia P2X4 expression and initiates neuropathic pain development

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1864-1873

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.89

关键词

chemokines; neuron-microglia communication; peripheral nerve lesion; tactile allodynia

资金

  1. Dutch NWO
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 1336]
  3. Kyushu University
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  6. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [221S0003, 23229008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Up-regulation of P2X4 receptors in spinal cord microglia is crucial for tactile allodynia, an untreatable pathological pain reaction occurring after peripheral nerve injury. How nerve injury in the periphery leads to this microglia reaction in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord is not yet understood. It is shown here that CCL21 was rapidly expressed in injured small-sized primary sensory neurons and transported to their central terminals in the dorsal horn. Intrathecal administration of a CCL21-blocking antibody diminished tactile allodynia development in wildtype animals. Mice deficient for CCL21 did not develop any signs of tactile allodynia and failed to up-regulate microglial P2X4 receptor expression. Microglia P2X4 expression was enhanced by CCL21 application in vitro and in vivo. A single intrathecal injection of CCL21 to nerve-injured CCL21-deficient mice induced long-lasting allodynia that was undistinguishable from the wild-type response. This effect of CCL21 injection was strictly dependent on P2X4 receptor function. Since neuronal CCL21 is the earliest yet identified factor in the cascade leading to tactile allodynia, these findings may lead to a preventive therapy in neuropathic pain. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 1864-1873. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.89; Published online 25 March 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据