4.6 Article

Limitations to oxygen transport and utilization during sprint exercise in humans: evidence for a functional reserve in muscle O2 diffusing capacity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 593, 期 20, 页码 4649-4664

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP270408

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain [DEP2009-11638]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the contribution of convective and diffusive limitations to (V) over dot(O2 peak) during exercise in humans, oxygen transport and haemodynamics were measured in 11 men (22 +/- 2years) during incremental (IE) and 30s all-out cycling sprints (Wingate test, WgT), in normoxia (Nx, P-IO2: 143mmHg) and hypoxia (Hyp, P-IO2: 73mmHg). Carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) was increased to 6-7% before both WgTs to left-shift the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve. Leg (V) over dot(O2 peak) was measured by the Fick method and leg blood flow (BF) with thermodilution, and muscle O-2 diffusing capacity (D-MO2) was calculated. In the WgT mean power output, leg BF, leg O-2 delivery and leg O2 were 7, 5, 28 and 23% lower in Hyp than Nx (P<0.05); however, peak WgT D-MO2 was higher in Hyp (51.5 +/- 9.7) than Nx (20.5 +/- 3.0mlmin(-1)mmHg(-1), P<0.05). Despite a similar P-aO2 (33.3 +/- 2.4 and 34.1 +/- 3.3mmHg), mean capillary P-O2 (16.7 +/- 1.2 and 17.1 +/- 1.6mmHg), and peak perfusion during IE and WgT in Hyp, D-MO2 and leg (V) over dot(O2) were 12 and 14% higher, respectively, during WgT than IE in Hyp (both P<0.05). D-MO2 was insensitive to COHb (COHb: 0.7 vs. 7%, in IE Hyp and WgT Hyp). At exhaustion, the Y equilibration index was well above 1.0 in both conditions, reflecting greater convective than diffusive limitation to the O-2 transfer in both Nx and Hyp. In conclusion, muscle (V) over dot(O2) during sprint exercise is not limited by O-2 delivery, O-2 offloading from haemoglobin or structure-dependent diffusion constraints in the skeletal muscle. These findings reveal a remarkable functional reserve in muscle O-2 diffusing capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据