4.5 Article

Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 33, 期 16, 页码 2516-2526

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201200031

关键词

Isoelectric focusing; Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Proteomic profiling; Sample fractionation

资金

  1. Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases at the Harvard University School of Public Health
  2. National Elite Foundation of Iran
  3. Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH) [UL1 RR 025758]
  4. Harvard University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fractionation of complex samples at the cellular, subcellular, protein, or peptide level is an indispensable strategy to improve the sensitivity in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling. This study revisits, evaluates, and compares the most common gel-based protein separation techniques i.e. 1D SDS-PAGE, 1D preparative SDS-PAGE, IEF-IPG, and 2D-PAGE in their performance as fractionation approaches in nano LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards and mitochondrial extracts isolated from rat liver. This work demonstrates that all the above techniques provide complementary protein identification results, but 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG had the highest number of identifications. The IEF-IPG technique resulted in the highest average number of detected peptides per protein. The 2D-PAGE was evaluated as a protein fractionation approach. This work shows that the recovery of proteins and resulting proteolytic digests is highly dependent on the total volume of the gel matrix. The performed comparison of the fractionation techniques demonstrates the potential of a combination of orthogonal 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG for the improved sensitivity of profiling without significant decrease in throughput.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据