4.5 Article

Evaluation and optimization of removal of an acid-insoluble surfactant for shotgun analysis of membrane proteome

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 31, 期 16, 页码 2705-2713

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000161

关键词

LC-MS/MS; Membrane proteome; Shotgun analysis; Sodium deoxycholate; Surfactant

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2004CCA00300]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program or 863 Program of China [2006AA02Z141]
  3. National Basic Research Program or 973 Program of China [2010CB529800, 2007CB914203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to its compatibility with protease activity at high concentration, sodium deoxycholate (SDC) can be used to effectively improve the solubilization and enzymolysis of membrane proteins and has received increasing attention in the field of membrane proteome analysis in recent years. SDC can be removed from digests by means of acidification followed by centrifugation (i.e. acid precipitation, AP) or extraction with ethyl acetate (i.e. phase transfer, PT) so as not to interfere with the downstream analyses like LC-MS/MS. In this study, the two strategies were systematically evaluated, compared and optimized. The results of the study demonstrated that both of the AP and PT strategies led to a certain amount of tryptic peptides being lost, and in PT strategy even more peptides were lost during SDC removal process. However, the lost peptides could be mostly recovered by washing the pellet and solid content produced during AP and PT, respectively. By recovering the lost peptides, the identification efficiency of proteins, especially transmembrane and low abundance ones, was significantly improved. Comparatively, after optimization by recovering the lost peptides, AP strategy was superior to PT strategy because the former not only could achieve the comparable identification efficiency with the latter but also was more economical, safer and easier to operate than the latter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据