4.2 Article

Comparison of different methods for total RNA extraction from sclerotia of Rhizoctonia solani

期刊

出版社

UNIV CATOLICA DE VALPARAISO
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2013.12.009

关键词

Polyvinylpyrrolidone; Rhizoctonia solani; RT-PCR; Sclerotia; Sodium dodecyl sulfate; Total RNA extraction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271994]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rhizoctonia solani (teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris) is one of the most important pathogens of rice (Oryza sativa L.) that causes severe yield losses in all rice-growing regions. Sclerotia, formed from the aggregation of hyphae, are important structures in the life cycles of R. solani and contain a large quantity of polysaccharides, lipids, proteins and pigments. In order to extract high-quality total RNA from the sclerotia of R. solani, five methods, including E.Z.N.A.(TM) Fungal RNA Kit, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-sodium borate, SDS-polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), guanidinium thiocyanate (GTC) and modified Trizol, were compared in this study. Results: The electrophoresis results showed that it failed to extract total RNA from the sclerotia using modified Trizol method, whereas it could extract total RNA from the sclerotia using other four methods. Further experiments confirmed that the total RNA extracted using SDS-sodium borate, SDS-PVP and E.Z.N.A.(TM) Fungal RNA Kit methods could be used for RT-PCR of the specific amplification of GAPDH gene fragments, and that extracted using GTC method did not fulfill the requirement for above-mentioned RT-PCR experiment. Conclusion: It is concluded that SDS-sodium borate and SDS-PVP methods were the better ones for the extraction of high-quality total RNA that could be used for future gene cloning and expression studies, whereas E.Z.N.A.(TM) Fungal RNA Kit was not taken into consideration when deal with a large quantity of samples because it is expensive and relatively low yield. (C) 2014 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据