4.6 Article

Direct electroiodimetric sensing of reducing biomolecules using a modified multiwall carbon nanotube/ionic liquid paste electrode by tetra-n-octylammonium triiodide

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 477-488

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.125

关键词

Electroiodimetriy; Carbon nanotube ionic liquid electrode; Ascorbic acid; Cysteine; Dopamine

资金

  1. Shiraz University Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective, sensitive and simple method as a direct electroiodimetric determination of reducing biological substances using a modified multiwall carbon nanotube/ionic liquid paste electrode has been introduced. Tetra-n-octylammonium triiodide (TOAI(3)) was used as a new modifier which was simply synthesized and characterized. By combining the advantages of both cyclic voltammetry and iodimetric technique, the problems associated with the classical iodimetry such as time consuming stages and indicator usage were removed. Three types of carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) with different structures were studied and their compositions were optimized. The appropriate one which was MWCNT/TOAI(3)/CILE (multiwall carbon nanotube/tetra-n-octylammonium triiodide/carbon ionic liquid electrode), displayed unique electrocatalytic behavior in acidic media and was validated for determination of ascorbic acid (AA), cysteine (Cys) and dopamine (DA) as typical reducing biomolecules in pharmaceutical and human blood serum samples. By applying cyclic voltammetry, the linear response ranges for the determination of AA, Cys and DA were recorded as 1.0-2500.0 mu M,1.0-1500.0 mu M, and 0.8-800.0 mu M, in order. The theoretical detection limits were found to be 1.0, 0.8, and 0.6 mu M for the determination of AA, Cys, and DA, respectively. The effect of some coexisting biomolecules in determination of these analytes was investigated and glucose effectively interfered. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据