4.6 Article

The photoelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction on TiO2@ZnO heterojunction by tuning the conduction band potential

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 23-29

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.216

关键词

Photoelectrocatalysis; CO2 reduction; Heterojunction; Redox potential; CB band

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21173106]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion [J17-18-913-2]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [17JR5RA212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photoelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction is an attracting research field in chemistry, materials, environment and energy science. In this paper, a heterojunction TiO2@ZnO was in-situ fabricated onto the FTO glass. The multi-functionalized heterojunctions of M-TiO2@ZnO/FTO (M = Pd, Pt, Ni and Au) were used as photocathodes in the photoelectrocatalytic cell of dye/M-TiO2@ZnO/FTO vertical bar KHCO3 vertical bar BiVO4. The working electrodes of dye/M-TiO2@ZnO/FTO were characterized by SEM, TEM, XRD, EPR, UV-vis, and FT-IR spectra. These photoelectrocatalytic cells convert efficiently CO2 to hydrocarbons at voltage of -0.6 similar to - 1.0 V under simulated sunlight irradiation. The conduction band potential of heterojunction TiO2@ZnO/FTO was adjusted by metal deposition, including Pd, Pt, Ni and Au, which can basically affect the process of CO2 reduction and give different selectivity for hydrocarbons, such as, methanol, ethanol, formic acid and acetic acid. The M-TiO2@ZnO/FTO photocathodes, possessing lower conduction band (CB) than - 0.38 V of standard reduction for methanol, can produce hydrocarbons due to the action of photons. On the other hand, the high electron charge transfer and active Ti3+ cations of TiO2 @ZnO/FTO heterojunction could augment the activity of photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide, yielding total hydrocarbons in a formation rate of 62.4 mu M cm(-2) h(-1). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据