4.6 Article

Facile fabrication of Pb(NO3)2/C as advanced anode material and its lithium storage mechanism

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 110-121

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.080

关键词

Pb(NO3)(2)/C; Anode material; Lithium-ion batteries; Ex-situ techniques; In-situ methods

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51104092]
  2. National 863 Program [2013AA050901]
  3. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University
  4. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing
  5. Die & Mould Technology [2012-P01]
  6. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices [KFJJ201209]
  7. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure [SKL201308SIC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pb(NO3)(2)/C is fabricated by a solution method and investigated for the first time as probable anode material for lithium-ion batteries. For pristine Pb(NO3)(2), the reversible specific capacity of 55.9 mAh g(-1) can be delivered with a poor capacity retention of 12.9% after 50 cycles. By introducing carbon black, it is found that a higher initial discharge capacity of 1140.7 mAh g-1 can be shown by Pb(NO3)(2)/C than the value of 938.5 mAh g(-1) delivered by pristine Pb(NO3)(2). After 50 cycles, Pb(NO3)(2)/C can display a reversible capacity of 241.5 mAh g(-1) with the capacity retention of 48.8%. The reaction mechanism of Pb(NO3)(2) with Li is studied by various in-situ and ex-situ techniques. It can be found that the preliminary reaction between Pb(NO3)(2) and Li leads to the irreversible formation of LiNO3, Li3N and Pb. Upon further lithiation, the electrochemical reaction of Pb with Li leads to the formation of LiPb and Li10Pb3, and finally Li8Pb3, Li22Pb5. The charge process is associated with the de-alloying reaction of Li8Pb3 and Li22Pb5 leading to the preliminary formation of LiPb and Li10Pb3, and finally Pb. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据