4.6 Article

A sandwich-type label-free electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for neurotensin based on sombrero model with graphene-hyaluronate-luminol composite

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 519-525

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.039

关键词

electrochemiluminescence immunosensor; graphene-hyaluronate-luminol composite; sombrero model; neurotensin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273130, 21375021]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY13B070013]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province of China [2012R405061]
  4. Major Project of Fujian Province [2011N5008]
  5. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau [2011050037, 2013A610080]
  6. Special Funds for Strategic Emerging Industries of Shenzhen [2113K3070038]
  7. Qianbaishi Candidate fund for Higher Education of Guangdong Province
  8. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive sandwich-type label-free electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunosensor based on sombrero model for the detection of neurotensin (NT) in human serum and urine was developed. Graphene-hyaluronate-luminol (G-HY-luminol) composite was coated on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode to build the ECL immunosensor, which gave in-situ ECL signals by luminol. A secondary NT unlabelled antibody was used to form the final sandwich immunocomplex as a sombrero model, facilitating reduction of the ECL intensity to improve the sensitivity of detection significantly. Results showed that the inhibition of ECL intensity increased with the logarithm of NT concentration within a wide linear range from 0.001 pg cm(-3) to 100 pg cm(-3). In addition, specificity, stability, reproducibility, regeneration and application were satisfactory. Therefore, this developed ECL immunosensor has a potential for practical detection of NT and NT-like peptides with small molecular weight in the clinical diagnostics. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据