4.6 Article

Study of Co3O4 mesoporous nanosheets prepared by a simple spray-drying process and their electrochemical properties as anode material for lithium secondary batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 44-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.217

关键词

Cobalt oxide; Anode material; Spray drying; Nanosheet material; Lithium secondary battery

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A2A02046367]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1B3002382]
  5. Seoul RBD Program [WR090671]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co3O4 nanosheets with superior electrochemical properties are prepared by a spray drying process. The precursor powders with a hollow and a thin-walled structure, obtained by the spray drying process, turn into nanosheets after a post-treatment process at temperatures below 600 degrees C. Citric acid dissolved in the spray solution of the cobalt precursor is a key material for the formation of the hollow thin-walled precursor powders. The mean crystallite sizes of the Co3O4 nanosheets post-treated at 200 and 400 degrees C are 17 and 24 nm, respectively. The mean powder sizes consisting of the nanosheets, as measured from the TEM images, are similar to the mean crystallite sizes of the powders. The discharge capacities of the Co3O4 nanosheets post-treated at 200 and 400 degrees C are 925 and 1102 mA h g(-1), respectively, at a current density of 1400 mA g(-1) after 100 cycles, and the corresponding capacity retentions, measured after the first cycle, are 91% and 110%. The initial discharge capacities of the Co3O4 nanosheets post-treated at 400 degrees C are 1199 and 1122 mA h g(-1) at high current densities of 3500 and 7000 mA g(-1), respectively, and the discharge capacities after 100 cycles are 868 and 695 mA h g(-1). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据