4.6 Article

pH-sensitive polymeric particles with increased inhibitor-loading capacity as smart additives for corrosion protective coatings for AA2024

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 123-131

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/72497/2010, SFRH/BD/72992/2010]
  2. FCT via Fatomag project [PTDC/CTM-MET/112831/2009]
  3. FCT: COMPETE (Sistema de Incentivos a Investigacao e Desenvolvimento Tecnologico, Projetos de I&DT Empresas em co-promocao)
  4. FEDER from the European Union, under QREN project, MONOFILEX [5418]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/72992/2010, SFRH/BD/72497/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work contributes to the design of smart anticorrosive coatings for corrosion protection of AA2024. Smart coatings, based on waterborne formulations modified with additives with high loading capacity of corrosion inhibitors open new opportunities for increased corrosion protection. In this work, a water-based epoxy coating was modified with Eudragit pH-sensitive particles. The particles are able to store a high amount of corrosion inhibitor (8-hydroxyquinoline) and to act as pH-sensitive reservoirs, dissolving at acidic pH values, releasing the stored inhibitor. The quantification of the loading capacity was determined by HPLC-MS/MS, using a methodology developed for this purpose. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to discriminate the electrical parameters assigned to the barrier properties of the coating and to the corrosion inhibition ability of coatings modified with Eudragit particles. The self-healing ability in artificial defects was studied by localized electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (LEIS). The results highlight the use of Eudragit particles as pH-sensitive reservoir, its ability to store higher contents of inhibitor when loaded with 8-hydroxyquinoline, and its self-healing potential. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据