4.6 Article

Electrochemical behavior of N and Ar implanted highly oriented pyrolytic graphite substrates and activity toward oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 477-487

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.100

关键词

Doped HOPG; Oxygen reduction reaction; Electrocatalysis; Ferrocyanide; Nitrogen functional groups

资金

  1. Fondazione Cariparo
  2. Ateneo Italo-Tedesco/Deutsch-ltalienisches Hochschulzentrum within the Vigoni bilateral framework

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper nitrogen and argon implanted highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) electrodes have been studied, with the aim of distinguishing whether the electrocatalytic activity of the modified electrodes is preferentially driven by chemical defects or by morphological defects. Modified HOPG electrodes have been prepared by ion implantation and fully characterized by photoemission spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy. Several different N-based defects have been identified and characterized in terms of their thermal stability. The modified electrodes were electrochemically characterized considering the electron-transfer kinetics of two redox probes Ru(III)(NH3)(6)Cl-3 and K4Fe(II)(CN)(6): both types of electrodes show an increased performance in terms of standard rate constant k(0) with respect to pristine HOPG for the oxidation of Fe(CN)(6)(4)- and this effect has been exclusively related to a morphological effect. N-implanted HOPG electrodes show an increased reactivity toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), the onset potential being more positive with respect to both Ar-implanted HOPG and pristine HOPG (0.09 and 0.28 V, respectively) and follow a four electrons reduction pathway to H2O. The results indicate that morphological as well as chemical defects are important factors for influencing the ORR kinetics. However, the enhanced ORR activity at N-HOPG suggests a pivotal role played by the N-based chemical defects. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据