4.6 Article

Comparing anode and cathode electrode/electrolyte interface composition and morphology using soft and hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 23-32

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.010

关键词

SEI; LiFePO4; Graphite; HAXPES; XPS

资金

  1. FFI (Strategic Vehicle Research)
  2. VINNOVA Green-car projects but StandUp for Energy
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Hybrid Vehicle Center
  5. Swedish Energy Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrode/electrolyte interface depth profiling was performed on lithiated graphite and delithiated lithium iron phosphate electrodes after electrochemical cycling in a balanced full cell configuration containing a carbonate based LiPF6 electrolyte. The profiling was performed by synchrotron radiation based hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, HAXPES, and soft X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, SOXPES. In this way, the probing depth was varied over a wide range in the order of 2-50 nm. Both more surface and more bulk sensitive investigations than possible using traditional in-house X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) could thus be performed. The composition and morphology of the lithiated graphite anode/electrolyte interface (solid electrolyte interphase, SEI) and the delithiated lithium iron phosphate cathode/electrolyte interface (solid permeable interface, SPI) were compared. In the vicinity of the highly reductive graphite active material in the SEI, low binding energy components like Li2O were found while no obvious composition gradients were observed in the SPI. Both in the cathode SPI and the anode SEI, significant amounts of C-O and P-F containing compounds were found to deposit during cycling. Evidence for mixing of the porous binder and other SEI/SPI components was observed in both the anode and cathode electrode/electrolyte interfaces. The lithiated graphite SEI was estimated to be of the order of two tens of nanometers, while the cathode SPI thickness was estimated to a few nanometers only. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据